Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power, steam) merchant wholesalers · Connecticut

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1

Hartford, CT · ~96 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 runs at 321% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power, steam) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1: 7.1 TCR = 321% of Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power, steam) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 safety composite

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1: 3.8 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2019

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1's TCR rose 2.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423720 · Hartford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 321% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #26/31
  • PHOTO Jomar Distributors I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jomar Distributors Inc - Watertown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 averages 7.1 TCR (321% of the Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power, steam) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=6.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 falls in its industry

853 Boilers (e.g., heating, hot wa establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 31 Boilers (e.g., heating, hot wa employers in Connecticut.

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 (96 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plimpton and Hills Branch 1
Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 (96 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Plimpton and Hills Branch 1 has more employees than the Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.7 3.3 4 0 0
2018 10.7 5.3 6 0 0
2016 3.8 1.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423720 · CT · Hartford

853 Boilers (e.g., heating, hot water, power, steam) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 270 employers in Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jomar Distributors Inc - Watertown 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carr Supply Co 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hajoca 151 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Customer Service Center 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centerbrook 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE UniMetal Thomaston 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Industries, Inc. 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital 4,674 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Francis Hospital 3,165 FTE
NAT-TCR ND,BISMARCK - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mariak Industries 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Daytona Beach 430 Innovation Way 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The DM Burr Group - Swartz Creek Schools 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hanul Corp. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kroger (WC USX KOH) 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Structural Steel Erector 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Desert Regional M/C Evs 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.