Distribution of electric power · California

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative

Portola, CA · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative runs at 598% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative: 7.2 TCR = 598% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative safety composite

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2024

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative injury rate improved

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative's TCR fell 3.0 from 8.4 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.4 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Portola, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 598% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #201/260
  • PHOTO Greenville Pioneer E…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenville Pioneer Electric Cooperative, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative averages 7.2 TCR (598% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2018=8.4 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=12.5 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 260 Distribution of electric power employers in California.

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (57 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative
Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative (57 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Plumas Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 3 0 0
2023 12.5 5.4 7 0 0
2022 3.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.5 1.9 3 0 0
2020 7.5 0.0 4 0 0
2018 8.4 2.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CA · Portola

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenville Pioneer Electric Cooperative, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Western Electric Cooperative, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Bear Lake Service Center-PB 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auburn Headquarters 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Village Markets LLC- PORTOLA LOCATION 24 FTE
NAT-TCR NVL016 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Armstrong Comfort Solutions - Butler 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Weed Man LLC 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Oak Rehab and Care Center & WEL-Home Health Red Oak 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reisterstown Lumber Co 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rahns Construction Materials Company 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Atl C27 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Chicago Distribution 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.