Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Mississippi

Plymouth Tube Company

Eupora, MS · ~145 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plymouth Tube Company runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade B.

Plymouth Tube Company: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plymouth Tube Company safety composite

Plymouth Tube Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Plymouth Tube Company injury rate improved

Plymouth Tube Company's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Eupora, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Welspun Tubular
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Welspun Tubular (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Plymouth Tube Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plymouth Tube Company averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plymouth Tube Company TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Plymouth Tube Company falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Mississippi.

Plymouth Tube Company (145 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plymouth Tube Company
Plymouth Tube Company (145 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Plymouth Tube Company has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 0.7 4 0 0
2018 3.0 0.6 5 0 0
2017 3.3 1.6 6 0 0
2016 2.2 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · MS · Eupora

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 9 employers in Eupora, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Welspun Tubular 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skylinesteel, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Permalok A Northwest Pipe Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Tube 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Timber Products 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2519 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michael Hatcher & Associates 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eubanks Produce, Inc. 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webster Health Services 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversicare of Eupora 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plymouth Tube Company- Eupora 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR DBA: Diversicare of Eurpora 103 FTE
NAT-TCR Bobby Dodd Institute 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecolab-McDonough 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR JMC Electrical Contractor LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Holographix 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accusoft Corporation 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #651 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #898 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.