Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · California

PnP Moss Landing

Moss Landing, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PnP Moss Landing runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

PnP Moss Landing: 4.0 TCR = 184% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PnP Moss Landing safety composite

PnP Moss Landing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2017→2024

PnP Moss Landing injury rate improved

PnP Moss Landing's TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.0 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Moss Landing, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/91
  • PHOTO 1944
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1944 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PnP Moss Landing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PnP Moss Landing averages 4.0 TCR (184% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PnP Moss Landing TCR series: 2017=7 · 2018=7 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where PnP Moss Landing falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 91 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in California.

PnP Moss Landing (24 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate PnP Moss Landing
PnP Moss Landing (24 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

PnP Moss Landing has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2019 8.6 8.6 2 0 0
2018 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2017 7.0 3.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Moss Landing

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 11 employers in Moss Landing, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1944 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OmniSource, LLC. - Mansfield 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salinas 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PADNOS Lansing Division 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rocha Brothers Farms, LLC 981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Farms 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Leal 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Farms, LLC 253 FTE
NAT-TCR S08744 - WM Walton County 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Olympia WA Yard 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Newberry County Memorial Hospital 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Baltimore,MD-5800 Chemical 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S05436 - WM Mercer County Transfer 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5th Avenue Building - BHC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Woods Manor 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skarlupka Manufacturing Inc. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.