Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · California

PnP Oakland Transportation

Oakland, CA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PnP Oakland Transportation runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

PnP Oakland Transportation: 4.0 TCR = 182% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PnP Oakland Transportation safety composite

PnP Oakland Transportation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

PnP Oakland Transportation injury rate improved

PnP Oakland Transportation's TCR fell 3.2 from 9.2 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 182% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/91
  • PHOTO Gary Scrap Yard
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gary Scrap Yard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PnP Oakland Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PnP Oakland Transportation averages 4.0 TCR (182% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PnP Oakland Transportation TCR series: 2017=9.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4 · 2023=0 · 2024=6 · BLS 2.2

Where PnP Oakland Transportation falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 91 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in California.

PnP Oakland Transportation (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate PnP Oakland Transportation
PnP Oakland Transportation (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

PnP Oakland Transportation has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.9 9.9 3 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 9.2 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Oakland

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gary Scrap Yard 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angleboard - Blue Ridge Plastics 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Auto Shredding 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRG a Division of Alter Trading Rogers 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR S03327 - Phoenix Hauling South 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Rapids Clinic 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IECC - Olney Central College 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aberdeen Road Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE R29EL - Hibbing Minerals Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE R29JZ - Little Falls Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desert Star Energy Center - 01 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota Contracting Corporation 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.