Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · California

PnP Richmond

Richmond, CA · ~31 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PnP Richmond runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

PnP Richmond: 3.5 TCR = 157% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PnP Richmond safety composite

PnP Richmond scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.5

2017→2024

PnP Richmond injury rate improved

PnP Richmond's TCR fell 14.5 from 14.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Richmond, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 157% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/91
  • PHOTO Moraine Recycling Pl…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moraine Recycling Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

PnP Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PnP Richmond averages 3.5 TCR (157% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PnP Richmond TCR series: 2017=14.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=7 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where PnP Richmond falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 91 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in California.

PnP Richmond (31 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate PnP Richmond
PnP Richmond (31 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

PnP Richmond has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.0 7.0 1 1 0
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 14.5 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Richmond

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moraine Recycling Plant 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reserve FTL, dba Reserve Marine Terminals 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMG Resources - Elizabeth, PA 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auburn Metal Processing 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR High School 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Middle Georgia Farm 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CFPG 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accudyne Systems, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus East 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodruff & Sons, Inc.-IN 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & S Tool and Machine Co 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.