Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) · Connecticut

Police Protection

Bethel, CT · ~82 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Police Protection runs at 445% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) workplace, earning a grade F.

Police Protection: 14.3 TCR = 445% of Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Police Protection safety composite

Police Protection scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Police Protection: 6.0 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 375.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2023

Police Protection's TCR rose 1.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 375.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Bethel, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 445% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #62/94
  • PHOTO Police Department
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Police Department (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Police Protection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Police Protection averages 14.3 TCR (445% of the Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Police Protection TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=18.7 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=32 · 2020=22.8 · 2021=9 · 2022=375 · 2023=7 · BLS 3.2

Where Police Protection falls in its industry

716 Police departments (except Ame establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 94 Police departments (except Ame employers in Connecticut.

Police Protection (82 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Police Protection
Police Protection (82 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Police Protection has fewer employees than the Police departments (except American Indi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.0 2.7 9 4 0
2022 375.0 375.0 3 0 0
2021 9.0 1.1 11 5 0
2020 22.8 2.5 4 5 0
2019 32.0 2.7 10 2 0
2018 4.2 1.2 3 4 0
2017 18.7 0.0 5 2 0
2016 6.0 6.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · CT · Bethel

716 Police departments (except American Indian or Alaska Native) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 64 employers in Bethel, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Police Department 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police Services 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Police Department 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Office Of Investigations Roll-Up (110012) 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE GROWER DIRECT FARMS 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silktown Roofing, Inc./Manchester CT 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Windsor Service 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerospace Techniques Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR ComNet Communications, LLC 533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leir 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memry Corporation #3 and #15 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memry Corporation #3 269 FTE
NAT-TCR Villages of Jackson Creek Memory Care 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland Propane, Inc. 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Oaks 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply-El Campo 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ebert Enterprises 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow Ford LLC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE MEC 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apeck Construction 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.