Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) · Texas

Poly Trucking

Grand Prairie, TX · ~343 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Poly Trucking runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Poly Trucking: 2.5 TCR = 54% of Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Poly Trucking safety composite

Poly Trucking scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Poly Trucking injury rate improved

Poly Trucking's TCR fell 1.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Grand Prairie, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #144/297
  • PHOTO Roehl Transport Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~343 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roehl Transport Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Poly Trucking in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Poly Trucking averages 2.5 TCR (54% of the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Poly Trucking TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=3.5 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2 · BLS 4.5

Where Poly Trucking falls in its industry

3,252 Bulk mail truck transportation establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 297 Bulk mail truck transportation employers in Texas.

Poly Trucking (343 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Poly Trucking
Poly Trucking (343 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Poly Trucking has more employees than the Bulk mail truck transportation, contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.5 7 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 5 0 0
2022 1.8 1.5 6 0 0
2019 3.5 3.0 14 0 0
2018 2.9 2.5 13 0 0
2017 2.2 2.0 10 0 0
2016 3.3 2.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TX · Grand Prairie

3,252 Bulk mail truck transportation, contract, long-distance (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roehl Transport Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashley Pacific North West - Oregon 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RDF Trucking Enterprises, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170856673 - TN-Nashville-Operating Center 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shell Permian - Midland Field Office 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tyler Area Office 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermon Inc. (San Marcos) Corporate Headquarters 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medtronic - Fort Worth 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Owensboro 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Park 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Bay Packaging Inc. Tulsa Division 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR M Health Clinics and Surgery Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunbelt Controls 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA KY Richmond Plant 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kahului Campus 343 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0043 343 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.