Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Texas

Polycoat Bedford

Bedford, TX · ~86 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Polycoat Bedford runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Polycoat Bedford: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Polycoat Bedford safety composite

Polycoat Bedford scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2024

Polycoat Bedford injury rate improved

Polycoat Bedford's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Bedford, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/39
  • PHOTO Colorado Paint Compa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colorado Paint Company II, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Polycoat Bedford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Polycoat Bedford averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Polycoat Bedford TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=5 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Polycoat Bedford falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 39 Industrial product finishes an employers in Texas.

Polycoat Bedford (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Polycoat Bedford
Polycoat Bedford (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Polycoat Bedford has more employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.0 1.3 4 0 0
2017 5.7 2.9 4 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · TX · Bedford

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 46 employers in Bedford, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colorado Paint Company II, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AkzoNobel VR Pontiac 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benjamin Moore 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHXPLT PHXPLT - PHX PLANT 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms, Permian Basin 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Food, Inc.- Klesel Complex 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sundown Tubing Testing 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Antonio Division 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health HEB 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR 020 Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter BloodCare 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1178 401 FTE
NAT-TCR RectorSeal Fall River 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Sioux Falls, Inc. (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - South Dakota) 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Greensboro, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SMR Farms 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE TUPELO 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Savannah 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Long Branch School District 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at John G Shedd Aquarium 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.