Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing · Illinois

PolyScience

Niles, IL · ~151 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PolyScience runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

PolyScience: 2.7 TCR = 81% of Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PolyScience safety composite

PolyScience scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

PolyScience injury rate improved

PolyScience's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Niles, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Sierra Controls, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sierra Controls, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

PolyScience in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PolyScience averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PolyScience TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where PolyScience falls in its industry

322 Temperature instruments, indus establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Temperature instruments, indus employers in Illinois.

PolyScience (151 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate PolyScience
PolyScience (151 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

PolyScience has more employees than the Temperature instruments, industrial proc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2022 3.9 3.1 5 0 0
2021 2.2 1.5 3 0 0
2020 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 3.3 2.6 5 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2016 3.7 3.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · IL · Niles

322 Temperature instruments, industrial process-type (except glass and bimetal thermometers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 111 employers in Niles, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sierra Controls, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seametrics 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEISS North America, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRC Global - 093 La Porte, TX (VEC) 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Eastern - IL Electric Ops 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sound Seal DBA Catalyst Acoustics 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Levy Company 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. Waterproofing 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aerospace Business Groups : Niles 1,010 FTE
CITY-NEAR Airframe Systems : Niles 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shure Incorporated 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3320 683 FTE
NAT-TCR 731/OGG 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alcal Phoenix Multi-Product 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fusion Ceramics, Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 2 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlas Machine and Supply, Inc. - Louisville 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missoula Composites 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE McGinnis, Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson Concrete Corp. Whole Company 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.