Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons · Texas

Port Arthur Plant

Port Arthur, TX · ~273 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Arthur Plant runs at 10% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons workplace, earning a grade A.

Port Arthur Plant: 0.3 TCR = 10% of Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Arthur Plant safety composite

Port Arthur Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Port Arthur Plant held a steady TCR band

Port Arthur Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325110 · Port Arthur, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 10% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #18/38
  • PHOTO LyondellBasell Indus…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~273 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LyondellBasell Industries - Corpus Christi, TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Port Arthur Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Arthur Plant averages 0.3 TCR (10% of the Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Port Arthur Plant TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Port Arthur Plant falls in its industry

66 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., bu establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 38 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., bu employers in Texas.

Port Arthur Plant (273 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 00.511.52 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Arthur Plant
Port Arthur Plant (273 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5

Port Arthur Plant has more employees than the Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethy median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2016 0.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325110 · TX · Port Arthur

66 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid hydrocarbons employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 122 employers in Port Arthur, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LyondellBasell Industries - Corpus Christi, TX 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. James 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Bayou 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCC South Charleston Facility 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2133 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE 12481 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution Center 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #685 (Market Street) 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Motiva Enterprises LLC 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 1,428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Echo Maintenance LLC 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Premcor Refining Group INC 773 FTE
NAT-TCR 6017-USA United States - Wah - Ca 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BRUCE 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Battelle - Richmond Operations 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Center 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2590 Waterpark Drive,LLC 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Center (Cacon) 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astoria-HQ 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Home Hickory DBA Trinity Village 273 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.