General warehousing and storage · California

Port logistics Building 16

Name: Port logistics Building 16 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chino Hills, CA · ~223 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 2.9
Avg TCR: 5.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port logistics Building 16 runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Port logistics Building 16: 2.9 TCR = 49% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port logistics Building 16 safety composite

Port logistics Building 16 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Port logistics Building 16: 0.6 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.19× in 2018

Port logistics Building 16's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.6 in 2017 to 5.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Chino Hills, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 49% of ind

DART 0.5 DART
RANK #381/1131
PHOTO National Distributio…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 46 inj
SIZE ~223 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-35 Rix Mills Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.9
National Distr

2.9
Fairburn - 515

2.9
Prime Now LLC

2.9
DC 97 - Montgo

2.9

What this shows Port logistics Building 16 averages 2.9 TCR (49% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Port logistics Building 16 TCR series: 2017=0.6 · 2018=5.2 · BLS 5.8

Where Port logistics Building 16 falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #381 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Port logistics Building 16 (223 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Port logistics Building 16 has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	5.2	0.5	18	1	0
2017	0.6	0.6	28	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Chino Hills

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 53 employers in Chino Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	National Distribution Centers LLC-35 Rix Mills Road	NEW CONCORD, OH	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fairburn - 5150 Oakley Industrial Boulevard	FAIRBURN, GA	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Prime Now LLC - UTX9	AUSTIN, TX	2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	DC 97 - Montgomery	MONTGOMERY, AL	2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	South Valley Farms	WASCO	223 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Treeland TL	LODI	223 FTE
STATE-SIZE	KICHIGO BERRY FARMS	OXNARD	223 FTE
STATE-SIZE	OM&C - SACRAMENTO	SACRAMENTO	223 FTE
CITY-NEAR	People's Care	Chino Hills	1,235 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0473 - CHINO HILLS CA WHSE	Chino Hills	333 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0316 LOWE S OF CHINO HILLS CA	Chino Hills	133 FTE
CITY-NEAR	99 Ranch Market 1231	Chino Hills	128 FTE
NAT-TCR	Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Production	Hazlehurst, MS	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	001-DAY	Dayton, OH	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Highland Park Manor	Okmulgee, OK	2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	POET - Gowrie	Gowrie, IA	2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Sapona Manufacturing Company, Inc.	Franklinville, NC	223 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Metalex - North	Libertyville, IL	223 FTE
NAT-SIZE	VF Jeanswear Luray DC	Luray, VA	223 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Power Cartersville Plant	Cartersville, GA	223 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.