Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

Porter Hospice

Centennial, CO · ~72 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Porter Hospice runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Porter Hospice: 5.9 TCR = 156% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Porter Hospice safety composite

Porter Hospice scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2023

Porter Hospice injury rate improved

Porter Hospice's TCR fell 8.9 from 12.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Centennial, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 156% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #26/140
  • PHOTO Brookdale Valparaiso…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Valparaiso AL (IN) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Porter Hospice in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Porter Hospice averages 5.9 TCR (156% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Porter Hospice TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Porter Hospice falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

Porter Hospice (72 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Porter Hospice
Porter Hospice (72 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Porter Hospice has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 5.7 3.8 3 0 0
2018 5.4 1.8 3 0 0
2017 9.3 5.6 5 0 0
2016 12.4 8.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Centennial

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 204 employers in Centennial, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Valparaiso AL (IN) 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Ridge at Kernersville 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63175 SUNRISE OF CHERRY CREEK 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Bluff Senior Living 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blanca 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAUFFMAN WELL SERVICE, INC. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Drilling LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Station 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centura Corporate 2,994 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 2,726 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western States Fire Protection 1,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4028-ARW02 1,185 FTE
NAT-TCR RK-083-Winchester ( RK-083 ) 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #685 (Market Street) 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR High Peaks Resort Lake Placid 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Frye Regional Medical Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth Care Center Overland Park North 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE SALT LAKE CITY, UT (Specialty) 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bald Head Island Transportation, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE WinCup Higginsville 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.