Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables · California

Porterville Citrus, Inc.

Terra Bella, CA · ~414 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Porterville Citrus, Inc. runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables workplace, earning a grade D.

Porterville Citrus, Inc.: 8.5 TCR = 189% of Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Porterville Citrus, Inc. safety composite

Porterville Citrus, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Porterville Citrus, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Porterville Citrus, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.7 in 2019 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 28.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.7 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Terra Bella, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 189% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #181/236
  • PHOTO MALAGA CUT/SNACK
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 90 inj
  • SIZE ~414 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MALAGA CUT/SNACK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Porterville Citrus, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Porterville Citrus, Inc. averages 8.5 TCR (189% of the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Porterville Citrus, Inc. TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=28.3 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Porterville Citrus, Inc. falls in its industry

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #181 safest of 236 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an employers in California.

Porterville Citrus, Inc. (414 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Porterville Citrus, Inc.
Porterville Citrus, Inc. (414 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Porterville Citrus, Inc. has more employees than the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 10 1 0
2023 6.0 4.1 25 0 0
2022 5.2 2.5 20 5 0
2021 6.1 3.6 11 11 0
2020 28.3 25.8 15 75 0
2019 2.7 0.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Terra Bella

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Terra Bella, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MALAGA CUT/SNACK 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Andersen and Sons Shelling 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AB-Jacklin Seed-Othello 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Uni-Kool Yuma 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Level 10 Construction 414 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.J Kirkwood & Associates, Inc. 414 FTE
STATE-SIZE Firestone Walker Inc. -- Paso Robles CA 414 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2025 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacuinde FLC Inc 754 FTE
CITY-NEAR TERRA BELLA PLANT 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terra Bella 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sierra Forest Products 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Terson LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepe Ganga Cidra 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Garden of Sun City Center, LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooperative Producers, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE The M&R Companies 414 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burton Corporation 414 FTE
NAT-SIZE GAL Manufacturing Company LLC 414 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faurecia Interior Systems-Blue Springs 414 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.