Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers · Oregon

Portland Argyle

Portland, OR · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Argyle runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Portland Argyle: 2.8 TCR = 125% of Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Argyle safety composite

Portland Argyle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2023

Portland Argyle injury rate improved

Portland Argyle's TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423730 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.8 · 125% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO SID HARVEY INDUSTRIE…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SID HARVEY INDUSTRIES - Andrews/MITCO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Portland Argyle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Argyle averages 2.8 TCR (125% of the Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Argyle TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=4 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Portland Argyle falls in its industry

290 Warm Air Heating and Air-Condi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Warm Air Heating and Air-Condi employers in Oregon.

Portland Argyle (29 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Argyle
Portland Argyle (29 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Portland Argyle has fewer employees than the Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Eq median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.7 3.8 2 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423730 · OR · Portland

290 Warm Air Heating and Air-Conditioning Equipment and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SID HARVEY INDUSTRIES - Andrews/MITCO 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omega Holdings 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blevins 03 Lexington 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Daikin Comfort Technologies - KDC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE GardenScape Nursery INC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman Ag 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Administration Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Westward 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Riley Electric Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SXP Hernando 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DSC Poplarville 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4037 University of Detroit Mercy Student Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Water Main Cleaning Company (Rocky Hill Division) 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diesel Exchange, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gold Star FS, Inc. Cambridge 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ui 4811 (Dearborn - M) 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.