Skilled nursing facilities · Connecticut

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre

Portland, CT · ~106 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre runs at 307% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre: 19.9 TCR = 307% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre safety composite

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.8

2022→2023

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre injury rate improved

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre's TCR fell 7.8 from 23.9 in 2022 to 16.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=23.9 · 2023=16.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Portland, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.9 · 307% of ind

  • DART 16.1 DART
  • RANK #230/258
  • PHOTO Montezuma Health and…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Montezuma Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre averages 19.9 TCR (307% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre TCR series: 2022=23.9 · 2023=16.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 258 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Connecticut.

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre (106 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre
Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre (106 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Portland Care and Rehabilitation Centre has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 16.1 16.1 1 13 0
2022 23.9 23.9 0 20 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Portland

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 15 employers in Portland, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Montezuma Health and Rehabilitation 19.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christopher House of Worcester 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Hills Manor 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairacres Manor Inc. 19.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Controlled Air Inc 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Massconn Distributors CPL, Inc 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dur-A-Flex 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE IDEX Health & Science 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portland Care and Rehab Centre 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Portland - All Others 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR JARVIS AIRFOIL INC 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Connecticut - Portland 64 FTE
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply- Aransas Pass 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Isovolta, Inc. 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG522 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Data Metalcraft, Inc. 19.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hebeler LLC. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bel Air Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Bel Air at Teravista 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse #2 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.