Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Oregon

Portland Container

Portland, OR · ~119 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Container runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Portland Container: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Container safety composite

Portland Container scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2022

Portland Container injury rate improved

Portland Container's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.7 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.7 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO 4306 New Lenox Conta…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4306 New Lenox Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Portland Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Container averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Container TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Portland Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Oregon.

Portland Container (119 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Container
Portland Container (119 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Portland Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2019 2.9 2.1 4 0 0
2018 3.2 0.8 4 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OR · Portland

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4306 New Lenox Container 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Crawfordsville Container 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Philadelphia 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salem Operations Center 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland Water Bureau Engineering 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. B. Steel, LLC. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Bakery-Dunford Bakers 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Ashland Construction Company - Raleigh, NC 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Dearborn 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR District Center - Floating Employees 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S Thomas Construction, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Senior Care Health and Rehabilitation 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE J Bar B Foods Weimar 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nidec-Paragould 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shape Process Automation 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.