Petroleum and petroleum products bulk stations and terminals · New Hampshire

Portsmouth Marine Terminal

Portsmouth, NH · ~19 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portsmouth Marine Terminal runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Petroleum and petroleum products bulk stations and terminals workplace, earning a grade C.

Portsmouth Marine Terminal: 2.2 TCR = 99% of Petroleum and petroleum products bulk stations and terminals BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portsmouth Marine Terminal safety composite

Portsmouth Marine Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

Portsmouth Marine Terminal injury rate improved

Portsmouth Marine Terminal's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424710 · Portsmouth, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO M.G. Oil Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M.G. Oil Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Portsmouth Marine Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portsmouth Marine Terminal averages 2.2 TCR (99% of the Petroleum and petroleum products bulk stations and terminals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portsmouth Marine Terminal TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Portsmouth Marine Terminal falls in its industry

275 Petroleum and petroleum produc establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Petroleum and petroleum produc employers in New Hampshire.

Portsmouth Marine Terminal (19 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Portsmouth Marine Terminal
Portsmouth Marine Terminal (19 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Portsmouth Marine Terminal has fewer employees than the Petroleum and petroleum products bulk st median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.4 9.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424710 · NH · Portsmouth

275 Petroleum and petroleum products bulk stations and terminals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 119 employers in Portsmouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M.G. Oil Company 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOCO Energy Corp. - Kirkwood 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWE LLC, Syracuse, NY 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern VA Service Center 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Burl Land Clearing LLC 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Drilling and Blasting Inc 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Nutrition Group- Bow 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE A.P. Extrusion, Inc. 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Portsmouth 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portsmouth Regional Hospital 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-DTSV 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-LWH 330 FTE
NAT-TCR Plus Mark LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilltop 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Havre Gas Production 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers City Plant 2.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.