Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing · Virginia

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division

Ashland, VA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division safety composite

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2021→2023

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division injury rate improved

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333999 · Ashland, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P60
  • PHOTO Filtration : Metamor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Filtration : Metamora EMHFF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division TCR series: 2021=4.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division falls in its industry

242 Filters, industrial and genera establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division (50 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division
Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division (50 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Porvair Filtration, Ashland Division has fewer employees than the Filters, industrial and general line (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333999 · VA · Ashland

242 Filters, industrial and general line (except internal combustion engine, warm air furnace), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 134 employers in Ashland, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Metamora EMHFF 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pall Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genesis Systems Group 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nordson B 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomaker USA 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Live Turkey - Dayton VA Hatchery 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glade Spring Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : RIC5 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC5 1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1730 RNDC-ASHLAND 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4609-1730 468 FTE
NAT-TCR ACME Industrial Piping, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Model T 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Southgate 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 300A 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hyundai Motor America - Eastern Region 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wagner Nineveh LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydradyne LLC 990 - Corporate 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coilplus Texas-Division of Coilplus Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.