Distribution of electric power · Wyoming

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette

Gillette, WY · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette: 2.3 TCR = 194% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette safety composite

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette injury rate improved

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=5.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Gillette, WY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.3 · 194% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO CMP - North Augusta …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMP - North Augusta Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wyoming employers → · Look up another →

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette averages 2.3 TCR (194% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=5.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wyoming alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Distribution of electric power employers in Wyoming.

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette
Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Powder River Energy Corp. Gillette has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2018 4.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · WY · Gillette

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 783 rated employers in Wyoming with headcount on file · 64 employers in Gillette, WY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMP - North Augusta Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockhart Power Company 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entergy Tulane 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rangeline Service Center 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3018211 - CYS05 SFF 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hladky Construction, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Country Store Gillette 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheridan #1130 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell County Health 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell County Government 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1485 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyclone Drilling Inc. 386 FTE
NAT-TCR CAL021 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Apple Core Enterprises LLC, dba DART Refrigeration 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ahern Menomonie (NW) 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S03279 - Annapolis Junction Transfer Station 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Construction, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Four Seasons Beer Dist., Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Macon County Building 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Factor Sales, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.