Real estate property managers' offices, residential · California

Powerstone Property Management, Inc.

Irvine, CA · ~241 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Powerstone Property Management, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 172% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. safety composite

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Powerstone Property Management, Inc.: 1.1 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Powerstone Property Management, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 1.1 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Irvine, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.4 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/47
  • PHOTO The Knolls CCRC Inde…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~241 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Knolls CCRC Independent Housing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Powerstone Property Management, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (172% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 1.4

Where Powerstone Property Management, Inc. falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 47 Real estate property managers' employers in California.

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. (241 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Powerstone Property Management, Inc.
Powerstone Property Management, Inc. (241 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Powerstone Property Management, Inc. has more employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 6 3 0
2023 2.3 0.5 1 4 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · CA · Irvine

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Knolls CCRC Independent Housing 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alaris Homes 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scott Properties Group Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Villages at Roll Hill 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mainas Farms LLC 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fowler Packing Field 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Calpine Energy Solutions 241 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHL USA INC- CA ALL locations 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Arco Excavation and Paving, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fenton Healthcare 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 3446 - Englewood 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 3197 - Burr Ridge IL 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fred Martin Motor Company 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norstar Trailers LLC 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE House of Flavors, Inc 241 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Manor 241 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.