Timing gears and chains, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing · Michigan

Powertrain Headquaters

Pontiac, MI · ~2,839 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Powertrain Headquaters runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Timing gears and chains, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Powertrain Headquaters: 0.4 TCR = 7% of Timing gears and chains, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Powertrain Headquaters safety composite

Powertrain Headquaters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Powertrain Headquaters held a steady TCR band

Powertrain Headquaters's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Pontiac, MI AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/55
  • PHOTO Reman Powertrain Ind…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~2,839 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reman Powertrain Indiana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Powertrain Headquaters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Powertrain Headquaters averages 0.4 TCR (7% of the Timing gears and chains, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Powertrain Headquaters TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Powertrain Headquaters falls in its industry

221 Timing gears and chains, autom establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 55 Timing gears and chains, autom employers in Michigan.

Powertrain Headquaters (2,839 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Powertrain Headquaters
Powertrain Headquaters (2,839 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Powertrain Headquaters has more employees than the Timing gears and chains, automotive and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.5 0.1 4 2 0
2021 0.6 0.3 9 0 0
2020 0.3 0.2 4 0 0
2019 0.4 0.1 9 2 0
2018 0.3 0.2 12 0 0
2017 0.3 0.1 9 1 0
2016 0.3 0.1 10 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · MI · Pontiac

221 Timing gears and chains, automotive and truck gasoline engine, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pontiac, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reman Powertrain Indiana 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Facility 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Facility 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diamond Racing LLC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DET3 2,861 FTE
STATE-SIZE Macomb County 2,773 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryker Instruments - 1941 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital SJMHS MI 2,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND 1,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR 258231-MICHIGAN METROPLEX MI P&DC 1,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pontiac Engineering 1,210 FTE
NAT-TCR 362 - Cedar Hill 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Odin Construction Solutions, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cuero, Texas 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dodgeville 2,840 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costa Farms, LLC 2,836 FTE
NAT-SIZE MasTec MNS Wireline 2,842 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.