Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC

Temple, TX · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC: 0.5 TCR = 39% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC safety composite

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC held a steady TCR band

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Temple, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/86
  • PHOTO Power Producer
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Power Producer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC averages 0.5 TCR (39% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC (34 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC
PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC (34 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

PPG-O&M Panda Temple Power LLC has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Temple

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 177 employers in Temple, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Power Producer 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teche Power Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Middletown Power LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joliet Station 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple 5,743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott & White Memorial Hospital 4,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Health 4,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLINIC-TEMPLE REGION 1,633 FTE
NAT-TCR Broadway Mechanical-Contractors, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 33 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bioventus, LLC Memphis 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Allegiance Health Management, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cal Coast Acidizing Service, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evolve Additive Solutions, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henriksen Contracting, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell Brothers, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.