Administrative management consulting services · Pennsylvania

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP

Pittsburgh, PA · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Administrative management consulting services workplace, earning a grade B.

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP: 0.3 TCR = 70% of Administrative management consulting services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP safety composite

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP held a steady TCR band

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541611 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO 4701-527
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4701-527 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Practical Administrative Solutions, LP averages 0.3 TCR (70% of the Administrative management consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Practical Administrative Solutions, LP falls in its industry

128 Administrative management cons establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Administrative management cons employers in Pennsylvania.

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP (95 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Practical Administrative Solutions, LP
Practical Administrative Solutions, LP (95 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Practical Administrative Solutions, LP has more employees than the Administrative management consulting ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541611 · PA · Pittsburgh

128 Administrative management consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4701-527 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Strategic Resources, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR REN750-752 Corp Support 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forever Living Products, LLC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 301-NiSource-Uniontown PA 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE DL George and Sons Manufacturing Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Systems, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Field 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Fayetteville/Raleigh, NC HVAC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Miami, FL HVAC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-Cities, TN HVAC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Samsung C&T America Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colstrip 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCWR Frank R. Bowerman Landfill 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shippers Warehouse-Bolingbrook 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jamaica Bay inn 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.