Continuing care retirement communities · Minnesota

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC

Eden Prairie, MN · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC: 12.5 TCR = 329% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC safety composite

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC: 7.7 → 17.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2021

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC's TCR rose 9.6 from 7.7 in 2020 to 17.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 329% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #168/226
  • PHOTO Fort Scott Presbyter…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fort Scott Presbyterian Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC averages 12.5 TCR (329% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC TCR series: 2020=7.7 · 2021=17.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 226 Continuing care retirement com employers in Minnesota.

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC (50 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC
Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC (50 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Prairie Bluffs Senior Living Operations LLC has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 17.3 11.5 6 0 0
2020 7.7 7.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Eden Prairie

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fort Scott Presbyterian Village 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TerraBella Little Avenue 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk River Senior Living Operations LLC 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Dwight 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Star 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louriston 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Dublin 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center-UB 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Sentinel Structures, Inc. 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SunnyBrook of Burlington 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pondera Medical Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Flossmoor High School 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Plant 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh NC FXFE-RGH 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden Village 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bostik Greenville Nonwoven 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.