Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Louisiana

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc.

Hammond, LA · ~64 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. safety composite

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. held a steady TCR band

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Hammond, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO 4385 Neenah Sheet Pl…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4385 Neenah Sheet Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Louisiana.

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. (64 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Delta Container), Inc.
Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. (64 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt (Delta Container), Inc. has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · LA · Hammond

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 101 employers in Hammond, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4385 Neenah Sheet Plant 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4046 Mooresville Container 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mishawaka Container 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Park - D009 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HSI 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE 111673-VALERO ST. CHARLES 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE HB Rentals, L.C. Broussard, LA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanderson Farms Hammond Processing 600 FTE
CITY-NEAR 489 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 489 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intralox LLC - Hammond 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Mt Storm Pw St 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salvo Auto Parts Crain Highway location 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salvo Auto Parts Bel Air location 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salvo Auto Parts Woodmoor location 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 222 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gerome Manufacturing Company 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE JC Custom Welding & Electric, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabritex Inc 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.