Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

Pratt Display - Reading

Reading, PA · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt Display - Reading runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Pratt Display - Reading: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt Display - Reading safety composite

Pratt Display - Reading scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2020

Pratt Display - Reading injury rate improved

Pratt Display - Reading's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/81
  • PHOTO Lexington (00270) We…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lexington (00270) Welch Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pratt Display - Reading in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt Display - Reading averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt Display - Reading TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt Display - Reading falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 81 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Pennsylvania.

Pratt Display - Reading (69 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt Display - Reading
Pratt Display - Reading (69 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt Display - Reading has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.5 4.1 4 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Reading

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lexington (00270) Welch Packaging 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewisburg Container 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt Industries (Target Container) Display Division 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Northern Corporation - Chippewa Falls 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Materials Division 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eddystone 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBC Associates, Inc. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE HHC Winfield 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ALS Twin Maples 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Insteel Wire Products - St. Joseph, MO 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waste Services of Tennessee-Chattanooga 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inscape 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cash Saver #2331 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.