Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Missouri

Pratt (Love Box), LLC

Kansas City, MO · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Love Box), LLC runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Pratt (Love Box), LLC: 1.9 TCR = 56% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Love Box), LLC safety composite

Pratt (Love Box), LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2024

Pratt (Love Box), LLC injury rate improved

Pratt (Love Box), LLC's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=4.0 · 2018=3.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/36
  • PHOTO Fenton Container
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fenton Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Love Box), LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Love Box), LLC averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Love Box), LLC TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=4 · 2018=3.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt (Love Box), LLC falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 36 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Missouri.

Pratt (Love Box), LLC (68 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Love Box), LLC
Pratt (Love Box), LLC (68 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt (Love Box), LLC has fewer employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 1.7 2 0 0
2017 4.0 4.0 3 0 0
2016 3.2 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MO · Kansas City

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fenton Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JACKSON, TN 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hood Container Greensboro 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLANO, TX 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sedalia Growout 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 033 - Substation Maintenance Metro 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mentz 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABI CORPORATION 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Maple Mountain Group Inc (Modere) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BHS Robotics, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Turbo Drill Industries 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Michaels Elementary 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weston LLC 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit Thermal 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hendricks Public School 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burton Industries 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.