Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Oklahoma

Pratt (Love Box), LLC

Tulsa, OK · ~58 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt (Love Box), LLC runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt (Love Box), LLC: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt (Love Box), LLC safety composite

Pratt (Love Box), LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2024

Pratt (Love Box), LLC injury rate improved

Pratt (Love Box), LLC's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO Jackson - D013
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jackson - D013 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Pratt (Love Box), LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt (Love Box), LLC averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt (Love Box), LLC TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt (Love Box), LLC falls in its industry

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugate establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Shipping containers, corrugate employers in Oklahoma.

Pratt (Love Box), LLC (58 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt (Love Box), LLC
Pratt (Love Box), LLC (58 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pratt (Love Box), LLC has fewer employees than the Shipping containers, corrugated, made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OK · Tulsa

1,338 Shipping containers, corrugated, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jackson - D013 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Jet Corr.) Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhart Graphics (00110) Welch Packaging 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CorrChoice Massillon 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore Office 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE McAlester Operations 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store Construction & Maintenance 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evans & Associates Utility Services, Inc. - Oklahoma City 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Del Monte Fresh Produce NA Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gibson Technical Services 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Chateau Napoleon Caring LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Marble and Granite, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Genco delivery 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Classic Protective Coatings Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sportable Scoreboards, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medical Illumination International, Inc. 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.