Specialty coatings, robotic systems · Alabama

Pratt & Whitney Automation

Madison, AL · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Automation runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Specialty coatings, robotic systems workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney Automation: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Specialty coatings, robotic systems BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Automation safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Automation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pratt & Whitney Automation held a steady TCR band

Pratt & Whitney Automation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Madison, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/22
  • PHOTO BlueScope Coated Pro…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BlueScope Coated Products / Metal Coaters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Automation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Automation averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Specialty coatings, robotic systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Automation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Automation falls in its industry

646 Specialty coatings, robotic sy establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 22 Specialty coatings, robotic sy employers in Alabama.

Pratt & Whitney Automation (52 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Automation
Pratt & Whitney Automation (52 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Pratt & Whitney Automation has fewer employees than the Specialty coatings, robotic systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · AL · Madison

646 Specialty coatings, robotic systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 131 employers in Madison, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BlueScope Coated Products / Metal Coaters 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Amherst, NY 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Spraying Technologies, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oerlikon Balzers Coating USA Inc - Lake Orion, MI 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mobile Division Hillcrest 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birmingham Division Trussville Crew Headquarters 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Complex 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters - APC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA Inc 4,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mazda Toyota Manufacturing, U.S.A., Inc. 1,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR Polaris Industries 1,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0580 - Huntsville DC 1,312 FTE
NAT-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Peach Bottom Station 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR FL002 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Regional Operations 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #58 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Croix Wood Components 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yolo Employment Services 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bashas 040 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bashas 047 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.