F135 Engine and Modules · Texas

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin

Fort Worth, TX · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical F135 Engine and Modules workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin: 1.2 TCR = 36% of F135 Engine and Modules BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin held a steady TCR band

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=8.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/20
  • PHOTO Supply Chain : McAll…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supply Chain : McAllen, TX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the F135 Engine and Modules BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=8.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin falls in its industry

366 F135 Engine and Modules establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 20 F135 Engine and Modules employers in Texas.

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin (21 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin
Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin (21 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pratt & Whitney Fort Worth Lockheed Martin has fewer employees than the F135 Engine and Modules median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.4 0.0 1 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · TX · Fort Worth

366 F135 Engine and Modules employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : McAllen, TX 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Atomization Technologies 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney Autoair, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meyer Tool Cox Plant 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grass Roots Farming LLC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawn Cattle Feeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Lakes Dairy LP 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP TEXAS MAINT 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Carilion Clinic-SCA Credit Services Co. 29 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wadsworth 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #60 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lezzer Manheim 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schupan Aluminum & Plastic Sales Toledo 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE On the Run #100 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torrey House 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Airport Services STL 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.