Refurbishment of jet engine and ground turbine airfoils · Texas

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc.

Grand Prairie, TX · ~284 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Refurbishment of jet engine and ground turbine airfoils workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Refurbishment of jet engine and ground turbine airfoils BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. safety composite

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc.: 0.4 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.2 from 0.4 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Grand Prairie, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO Services : Strother,…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Services : Strother, KS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Refurbishment of jet engine and ground turbine airfoils BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. falls in its industry

366 Refurbishment of jet engine an establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Refurbishment of jet engine an employers in Texas.

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. (284 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc.
Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. (284 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pratt & Whitney Services, Inc. has more employees than the Refurbishment of jet engine and ground t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.6 4 1 0
2023 0.8 0.4 1 1 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 1 0
2021 1.2 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.3 0.0 0 1 0
2019 1.1 0.3 4 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2017 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2016 0.4 0.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · TX · Grand Prairie

366 Refurbishment of jet engine and ground turbine airfoils employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Services : Strother, KS 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enjet Aero Newington 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFW Center 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main Office 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARLANXEO, Orange Site, Texas 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennbright 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fisher Road 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Reidsville 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryan Manufacturing Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Enerfab Power and Industrial, LLC. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 099 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Kansas City Marriott Downtown 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nevada Region 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 92 University of Rochester 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Playworld - Lewisburg 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.