Coating metals and metal products for the trade · North Carolina

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC

Charlotte, NC · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC safety composite

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC held a steady TCR band

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/12
  • PHOTO Headquarters
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Headquarters (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 12 Coating metals and metal produ employers in North Carolina.

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC (44 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC
Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC (44 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Praxair Surface Techologies, Inc. Charlotte NC has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · NC · Charlotte

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PK Industrial (Corpus Christi, TX) 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIKON PRODUCTS, INC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial US, Others 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Creek Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE WMSTN 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morganton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TFC LaVergne Feed Mill 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5100-Drc-Dead River Transport 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE NW Planning & Design Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reliance Steel & Aluminum DBA Smith Pipe & Steel 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.