Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Precision Engineering, Inc.

Uxbridge, MA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Engineering, Inc. runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Precision Engineering, Inc.: 7.1 TCR = 215% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Precision Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2022

Precision Engineering, Inc. injury rate improved

Precision Engineering, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 7.5 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Uxbridge, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 215% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #17/21
  • PHOTO DAWSON METAL CO INC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAWSON METAL CO INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Precision Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Engineering, Inc. averages 7.1 TCR (215% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2016=7.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=7 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 21 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Massachusetts.

Precision Engineering, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Engineering, Inc.
Precision Engineering, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Precision Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.0 3.5 1 1 0
2021 13.5 3.4 2 2 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 11.2 5.6 2 2 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2016 7.5 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · MA · Uxbridge

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 19 employers in Uxbridge, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAWSON METAL CO INC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson, Inc.-MTC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheet Metal Connectors Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blickman Industries 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE OPERATIONS CENTER - LOWELL DIV-MA40 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Building Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4675_10941 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred Salvucci Corporation 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR C40 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenze 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenze Americas, Inc. 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2532-25320800 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Bermex Tampa FL 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 054182-Lancaster Po 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 052160-Desert Hot Springs Po 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 287533-Spr-Southwest Carrier Anx 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wound & Hyperbaric Center & Outpatient Rehab 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain Center- Pressed Products Plant 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glaxo Smith Kline 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Tampa FL-Tampa Point Blvd (3808) 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.