Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · North Carolina

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc.

Raleigh, NC · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc.: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. safety composite

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2023

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. injury rate improved

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/37
  • PHOTO Seconn Fabrication
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seconn Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 37 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in North Carolina.

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc.
Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. (53 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Precision Machine Fabrication, Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · NC · Raleigh

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seconn Fabrication 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GES Sheet Metal,Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Classic Sheet Metal Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMS 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms St. Pauls Hatchery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Resource Center - PNG 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Master Telecommunications 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Pratt (Corrugated Logistics, LLC) Fort Worth 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NOVA Group, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue and Gold Fleet -Vallejo 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant WH 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wapakoneta, OH 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darigold Bozeman Plant 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE FabTech Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Packing Co Inc 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.