Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing · New York

Precision Machine Technologies

Rochester, NY · ~50 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Precision Machine Technologies runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Precision Machine Technologies: 5.3 TCR = 159% of Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Precision Machine Technologies safety composite

Precision Machine Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2017→2024

Precision Machine Technologies injury rate improved

Precision Machine Technologies's TCR fell 4.8 from 7.5 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.5 · 2018=10.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 159% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO MIRO MFG., INC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MIRO MFG., INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Precision Machine Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Precision Machine Technologies averages 5.3 TCR (159% of the Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Precision Machine Technologies TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2018=10.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=7 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Precision Machine Technologies falls in its industry

391 Turning machines (i.e., lathes establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 Turning machines (i.e., lathes employers in New York.

Precision Machine Technologies (50 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Precision Machine Technologies
Precision Machine Technologies (50 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Precision Machine Technologies has fewer employees than the Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalwo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2023 7.0 4.7 3 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 10.6 10.6 5 0 0
2017 7.5 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · NY · Rochester

391 Turning machines (i.e., lathes), metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MIRO MFG., INC 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Messer Cutting Systems Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Press Holdings 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPS Plant 3 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR S05208 - Chardon Hauling 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Hills 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta 070 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VES - Dimensions 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Education 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maggiora & Ghilotti, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ball Beverage Pkg 199 Kapolei 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belleville 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.