Manufacturing building construction · New Hampshire

Preferred Building Systems

Claremont, NH · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Preferred Building Systems runs at 475% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufacturing building construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Preferred Building Systems: 13.8 TCR = 475% of Manufacturing building construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Preferred Building Systems safety composite

Preferred Building Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Preferred Building Systems: 12.4 → 21.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Preferred Building Systems's TCR rose 9.0 from 12.4 in 2016 to 21.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Claremont, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 475% of ind

  • DART 15.2 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO The Tarrier steel co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 73 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Tarrier steel company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Preferred Building Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Preferred Building Systems averages 13.8 TCR (475% of the Manufacturing building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Preferred Building Systems TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=15.2 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=11.1 · 2021=10.1 · 2023=12.8 · 2024=21.3 · BLS 2.9

Where Preferred Building Systems falls in its industry

924 Manufacturing building constru establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Manufacturing building constru employers in New Hampshire.

Preferred Building Systems (74 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Preferred Building Systems
Preferred Building Systems (74 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Preferred Building Systems has more employees than the Manufacturing building construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.3 15.2 10 4 0
2023 12.8 4.3 9 0 0
2021 10.1 5.0 6 0 0
2020 11.1 8.3 8 0 0
2019 11.1 7.4 9 0 0
2018 16.1 10.8 10 2 0
2017 15.2 2.5 12 0 0
2016 12.4 2.5 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · NH · Claremont

924 Manufacturing building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 27 employers in Claremont, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Tarrier steel company 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A DUCHINI INC 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferris Coffee & Nut Co. 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Engineering & Construction 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salem Office 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Durgin and Crowell Lumber Company Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Temco Tool Co Inc 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&M Machine Products, Inc/DBA C&M Precision Tech 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red River Technology LLC 699 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1975 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1975 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #53 215 FTE
NAT-TCR Environment Control of South Sound 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flisl - Islamorada 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Willows Post Acute 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitchen Cabinet Designers- Orlando 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Security Fence Group, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fitzpatrick Painting Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadowview Nursing Center 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairless Plant 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.