Machine shops · California

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering

Cameron Park, CA · ~68 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Machine shops workplace, earning a grade C.

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering: 3.8 TCR = 115% of Machine shops BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering safety composite

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering: 2.8 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2020

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.8 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Cameron Park, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 115% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #75/126
  • PHOTO Frantz Machine Produ…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frantz Machine Products, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering averages 3.8 TCR (115% of the Machine shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering TCR series: 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering falls in its industry

1,821 Machine shops establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 126 Machine shops employers in California.

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering (68 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering
Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering (68 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Preferred Manuracturing Services Inc d.b.a. Snowline Engineering has more employees than the Machine shops median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.0 3.3 3 0 1
2019 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · CA · Cameron Park

1,821 Machine shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Cameron Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frantz Machine Products, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR QMI Headquarters 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEAR MANUFACTURING INC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neumeier Engineering, Inc 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Valley Land Co. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCFFO 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE VinePro Vineyard Management, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knights Grapevine Nursery 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doug Veerkamp General Engineering Inc. 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hemington Landscape Services 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01618 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nehemiah Rebar Services, Inc. 112 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0452 Charlotte 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The CORE Group- Metro NY 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacoby Feed & Seed 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Horizon Metals, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gastite 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orchard St. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Residences of Brandon 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Physicians Premier Saratoga 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.