Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing · New York

Pregis- Glens Falls

Queensbury, NY · ~97 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pregis- Glens Falls runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Pregis- Glens Falls: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pregis- Glens Falls safety composite

Pregis- Glens Falls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pregis- Glens Falls: 0.9 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2023

Pregis- Glens Falls's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.9 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Queensbury, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO Derby Fabricating So…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~97 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Derby Fabricating Solutions - Sidney (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Pregis- Glens Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pregis- Glens Falls averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pregis- Glens Falls TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pregis- Glens Falls falls in its industry

474 Foam plastics products (except establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Foam plastics products (except employers in New York.

Pregis- Glens Falls (97 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pregis- Glens Falls
Pregis- Glens Falls (97 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Pregis- Glens Falls has more employees than the Foam plastics products (except polystren median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2020 2.7 1.8 3 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2018 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · NY · Queensbury

474 Foam plastics products (except polystrene) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 62 employers in Queensbury, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Derby Fabricating Solutions - Sidney 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fagerdala/Sealed Air-Indianna 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innocor Central, LLC - West Chicago 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Roofing, East Moline 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - O&M New York 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease - Javits 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCD Elevator Repair, Inc 97 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brotherhood Winery 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR Bard / BD 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Work and Independence 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2116 369 FTE
NAT-TCR Washington (S6) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR PEC-POR_CUS 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J & E Supply and Fastener Co Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR QED54 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trucchi's Supermarket #1 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&B Manufacturing 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. 97 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit, Michigan 97 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.