Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing · Michigan

Pregis- Grand Rapids

Grand Rapids, MI · ~151 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pregis- Grand Rapids runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pregis- Grand Rapids: 3.2 TCR = 97% of Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pregis- Grand Rapids safety composite

Pregis- Grand Rapids scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Pregis- Grand Rapids injury rate improved

Pregis- Grand Rapids's TCR fell 3.0 from 6.3 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 97% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Flexpak
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flexpak (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pregis- Grand Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pregis- Grand Rapids averages 3.2 TCR (97% of the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pregis- Grand Rapids TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pregis- Grand Rapids falls in its industry

396 Film, plastics, packaging, man establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Film, plastics, packaging, man employers in Michigan.

Pregis- Grand Rapids (151 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pregis- Grand Rapids
Pregis- Grand Rapids (151 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pregis- Grand Rapids has more employees than the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.3 5 0 0
2023 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2022 1.3 0.6 4 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 5 0 0
2020 2.6 1.3 4 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2018 2.0 1.3 3 0 0
2017 5.6 2.1 8 0 0
2016 6.3 4.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · MI · Grand Rapids

396 Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flexpak 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allsafe Technologies Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WNA Chattanooga 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signode Industrial Group Muller 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kentwood 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkway Electric & Communications, LLC - Michigan 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acoustic Ceiling & Partition Company, Inc. dba Arbor Construction Personell 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanders 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Hutto TX Millwork 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Absolute Machine Tools, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lamart Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tolin Mechanical Systems Company 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE A & E Tools 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manchester NH 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yonkers 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE BB 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.