Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Massachusetts

Premier Fence LLC

Canton, MA · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Premier Fence LLC runs at 409% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade F.

Premier Fence LLC: 11.4 TCR = 409% of Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Premier Fence LLC safety composite

Premier Fence LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Premier Fence LLC: 12.6 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.48× in 2024

Premier Fence LLC's TCR rose 0.7 from 12.6 in 2018 to 13.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Canton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 409% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #25/26
  • PHOTO Lyons & Hohl Paving …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lyons & Hohl Paving Contractors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Premier Fence LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Premier Fence LLC averages 11.4 TCR (409% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Premier Fence LLC TCR series: 2018=12.6 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=13.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Premier Fence LLC falls in its industry

1,634 Fencing contractors (except el establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 26 Fencing contractors (except el employers in Massachusetts.

Premier Fence LLC (73 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Premier Fence LLC
Premier Fence LLC (73 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Premier Fence LLC has more employees than the Fencing contractors (except electronic c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.3 5.5 12 0 0
2023 7.7 6.4 4 2 0
2022 14.8 9.8 9 0 0
2021 8.9 8.9 5 0 0
2018 12.6 12.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MA · Canton

1,634 Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lyons & Hohl Paving Contractors 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patio Pools and Spas 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memphis Fence Company 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Wells Aquatics 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merrit Construction 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE GVW Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Massachusetts - Oxford 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warner Brothers 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Sea Pines 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis Gale Medical Center 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR King Kullen #11 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Midnight Express Powerboats 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oxford Derby Memory Care, LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electro Plate Circuitry, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCS - Prospect Park Zoo 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groth Corporation 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.