Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Texas

Presbyterian Home for Children

Amarillo, TX · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presbyterian Home for Children runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade B.

Presbyterian Home for Children: 2.5 TCR = 66% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presbyterian Home for Children safety composite

Presbyterian Home for Children scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Presbyterian Home for Children: 2.5 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2024

Presbyterian Home for Children's TCR rose 3.8 from 2.5 in 2019 to 6.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Amarillo, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 66% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #8/33
  • PHOTO Seattle 12713 30TH A…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seattle 12713 30TH AVE NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Presbyterian Home for Children in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presbyterian Home for Children averages 2.5 TCR (66% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presbyterian Home for Children TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=4.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Presbyterian Home for Children falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 33 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Texas.

Presbyterian Home for Children (46 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Presbyterian Home for Children
Presbyterian Home for Children (46 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Presbyterian Home for Children has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · TX · Amarillo

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 351 employers in Amarillo, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seattle 12713 30TH AVE NE 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADD, INC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEW ALTERNATIVES, INC - SAN PASQUAL RESIDENTIAL 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookside House 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coolwater 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE HALE CENTER FEED YARD 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wrangler Feedyard 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPG TEXAS COMPLEX -EST 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarillo Plant 3,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSA Hospital LLC 2,790 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-12071000-12071 1,839 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-30 1,492 FTE
NAT-TCR Fruit Harvest Family, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Duluth Fish Hatchery 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ragle Indiana 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S.I. Goldman Company, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid-Ohio Tubing, LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artis Senior Living of Davie 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone Vocational Services 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elgin IL 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.