Continuing care retirement communities · Georgia

Presbyterian Village Austell

Austell, GA · ~250 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presbyterian Village Austell runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Presbyterian Village Austell: 5.5 TCR = 145% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presbyterian Village Austell safety composite

Presbyterian Village Austell scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2024

Presbyterian Village Austell injury rate improved

Presbyterian Village Austell's TCR fell 8.0 from 12.1 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.1 · 2017=10.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Austell, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 145% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #34/77
  • PHOTO Brookdale Deer Creek…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Deer Creek Sarasota (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Presbyterian Village Austell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presbyterian Village Austell averages 5.5 TCR (145% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presbyterian Village Austell TCR series: 2016=12.1 · 2017=10.3 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Presbyterian Village Austell falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 77 Continuing care retirement com employers in Georgia.

Presbyterian Village Austell (250 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Presbyterian Village Austell
Presbyterian Village Austell (250 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Presbyterian Village Austell has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 3.4 6 0 0
2023 2.9 2.3 5 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2021 4.0 2.5 8 0 0
2020 2.8 1.4 6 0 0
2019 5.5 4.1 12 0 0
2017 10.3 5.1 20 0 0
2016 12.1 9.2 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Austell

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Austell, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Deer Creek Sarasota 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greencroft Goshen 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairway Knoll 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR DIGBY PLACE 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tencate Geosynthetics - Cornelia 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trion Finishing Plant 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTI Baths, Inc. 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caesarstone Technologies, USA Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Cobb Hospital 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Six Flags Over Georgia 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATLANTA OPERA WAREHOUSE 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plateau Excavation, Inc 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Iron Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 171 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Feeders 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 3121 Keystone 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Virginia Paving 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tumlinson Electric, LLC 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. J. Corman Railroad Services, Emergency, LLC 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE FPI Mechanical, Inc. 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.