Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing · California

Pressed Manufacturing

Dinuba, CA · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pressed Manufacturing runs at 470% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pressed Manufacturing: 15.5 TCR = 470% of Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pressed Manufacturing safety composite

Pressed Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 27.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pressed Manufacturing: 4.7 → 30.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 30.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.79× in 2020

Pressed Manufacturing's TCR rose 25.6 from 4.7 in 2018 to 30.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Dinuba, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 470% of ind

  • DART 27.7 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Delta Industrial Ser…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delta Industrial Services, Inc. (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pressed Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pressed Manufacturing averages 15.5 TCR (470% of the Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pressed Manufacturing TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=30.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pressed Manufacturing falls in its industry

269 Bottling machinery (e.g., capp establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Bottling machinery (e.g., capp employers in California.

Pressed Manufacturing (47 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pressed Manufacturing
Pressed Manufacturing (47 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Pressed Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filli median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 30.2 27.7 1 11 0
2019 11.7 11.7 3 1 0
2018 4.7 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · CA · Dinuba

269 Bottling machinery (e.g., capping, filling, labeling, sterilizing, washing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 44 employers in Dinuba, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delta Industrial Services, Inc. 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamrick Manufacturing & Service Inc 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUBURBAN MACHINE CORPORATION 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastey Enterprises 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR RNJ Harvesting Inc 1,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ruiz Foods Products 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aaron Ruiz 1,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prima Wawona - South Ranches 662 FTE
NAT-TCR ISF-Eliot 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Davis and Elkins College 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridgewood Center 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR National Fuel Distribution Niagara Falls Servicenter 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marinemax East, Inc.-Stu 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marinemax Inc-Nas 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Providence Health - EVS 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE ETMC - Tyler 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.