Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · North Carolina

Prestage Farms Inc.

Clinton, NC · ~786 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prestage Farms Inc. runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade D.

Prestage Farms Inc.: 5.8 TCR = 129% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prestage Farms Inc. safety composite

Prestage Farms Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Prestage Farms Inc. injury rate improved

Prestage Farms Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 6.8 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Clinton, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #6/13
  • PHOTO Esperanza
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 516 inj
  • SIZE ~786 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Esperanza (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Prestage Farms Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prestage Farms Inc. averages 5.8 TCR (129% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prestage Farms Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Prestage Farms Inc. falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 13 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in North Carolina.

Prestage Farms Inc. (786 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prestage Farms Inc.
Prestage Farms Inc. (786 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Prestage Farms Inc. has more employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 4.3 44 2 0
2023 4.1 4.0 27 1 0
2022 4.5 3.6 35 1 0
2021 4.0 3.5 38 0 0
2020 4.6 4.3 50 0 0
2019 6.2 5.6 68 0 0
2018 7.4 7.1 80 0 0
2017 9.3 7.9 101 2 0
2016 6.8 6.1 73 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · NC · Clinton

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Clinton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Esperanza 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pillen Transport 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARIZONA FINISHER & TRANS-EST 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOCUST RIDGE #1-3, 5-9 -EST 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NC Forest Service 787 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayer Crop Science RTP 787 FTE
STATE-SIZE AdventHealth Hendersonville 788 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hornets Basketball, LLC 788 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Sampson 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sampson Reginal Medical Center 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2580 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2580 264 FTE
NAT-TCR Store #112 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pueblo Store 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FLL Fort Lauderdale Airport 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AdventHealth Daytona Beach 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 786 FTE
NAT-SIZE 972 Brush Hollow Rd 786 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Manor 786 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fayetteville Complex 786 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.