Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Presto Appleton

Appleton, WI · ~349 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Presto Appleton runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Presto Appleton: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Presto Appleton safety composite

Presto Appleton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Presto Appleton held a steady TCR band

Presto Appleton's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.8 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326111 · Appleton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #5/34
  • PHOTO Gunze Plastics & Eng…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~349 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gunze Plastics & Engineering Corporation of America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Presto Appleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Presto Appleton averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Presto Appleton TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Presto Appleton falls in its industry

322 Food storage bags, plastics fi establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 34 Food storage bags, plastics fi employers in Wisconsin.

Presto Appleton (349 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Presto Appleton
Presto Appleton (349 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 118 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Presto Appleton has more employees than the Food storage bags, plastics film, single median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.1 0.8 3 1 0
2018 1.7 1.4 5 1 0
2017 0.8 0.6 1 2 0
2016 0.8 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326111 · WI · Appleton

322 Food storage bags, plastics film, single wall or multiwall, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gunze Plastics & Engineering Corporation of America 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR VILLA RICA METALIZING (3) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coveris Tomah 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liqui-Box Upper Sandusky 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE INNIO Waukesha Gas Engines, Inc 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Fueling Systems 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCD Sussex 349 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2106 - Fitchburg 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Casella Resource Solutions 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Propex Operaing Company, LLC Ringgold, GA. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn South Bend 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Innocor Foam Technologies - ACP, Inc. - Miami 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Mills (Albuquerque) 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hutchinson Sealing Systems, Inc 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Materials Incorporated 349 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa's Lowry Park Zoo 349 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.