Bottles, plastics, manufacturing · Florida

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging)

Jacksonville, FL · ~62 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bottles, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging): 1.5 TCR = 47% of Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) safety composite

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) held a steady TCR band

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 1.6 in 2022 to 1.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.6 · 2023=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326160 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO Plastipak- Keasbey
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plastipak- Keasbey (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) averages 1.5 TCR (47% of the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) TCR series: 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) falls in its industry

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi employers in Florida.

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) (62 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging)
Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) (62 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Pretium Packaging - Jacksonville (Alpha Packaging) has fewer employees than the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326160 · FL · Jacksonville

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plastipak- Keasbey 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berry Global 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Fairfield 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CKS Urbana 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 88 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCS Southern Customer Service 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walsingham Complex 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Service Center 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2632 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2633 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2844 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2910 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Station 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-102-Maysville ( RK-102 ) 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-067-Shelbyville ( RK-067 ) 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-049-Marion ( RK-049 ) 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.