Bottles, plastics, manufacturing · Missouri

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging)

St. Louis, MO · ~193 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bottles, plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging): 4.7 TCR = 142% of Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) safety composite

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2022→2023

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) injury rate improved

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging)'s TCR fell 3.6 from 6.5 in 2022 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.5 · 2023=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326160 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO Poly-Tainer, Inc. - …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Poly-Tainer, Inc. - Indiana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) TCR series: 2022=6.5 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) falls in its industry

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Bottles, plastics, manufacturi employers in Missouri.

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) (193 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging)
Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) (193 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) has more employees than the Bottles, plastics, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 1.7 7 0 0
2022 6.5 3.9 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326160 · MO · St. Louis

411 Bottles, plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Poly-Tainer, Inc. - Indiana 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Valley City, ND 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dana Plastic Container Corporation 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Boyertown, PA 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company of St. Louis 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE 12 - Kansas City Front. Street Plant 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE WireCo WorldGroup Sedalia 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Able Manufacturing & Assembly 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR 102 - Cocoa 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 607 - Southaven 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RG Engineering, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Calva Purina Milk Replacer Feed Mill 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zatarain's 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building Maintenance 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Hill # 9014 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Healthcare Resources LLC - 2 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.