Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Utah

Pride Logistics Corporation

Eagle Mountain, UT · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pride Logistics Corporation runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Pride Logistics Corporation: 4.2 TCR = 64% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pride Logistics Corporation safety composite

Pride Logistics Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pride Logistics Corporation: 0.0 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2023

Pride Logistics Corporation's TCR rose 8.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 8.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Eagle Mountain, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 64% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #5/56
  • PHOTO AIG Logistics, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AIG Logistics, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Pride Logistics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pride Logistics Corporation averages 4.2 TCR (64% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pride Logistics Corporation TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=8.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Pride Logistics Corporation falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 56 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Utah.

Pride Logistics Corporation (60 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Pride Logistics Corporation
Pride Logistics Corporation (60 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Pride Logistics Corporation has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.3 5.2 8 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · UT · Eagle Mountain

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 15 employers in Eagle Mountain, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AIG Logistics, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR IABUR - BURLINGTON 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 3101 TCHULAHOMA RD 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 2617 DEMOCRAT RD 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tooele 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perennial Favorites 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intrepid 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Homes & Roofing, LLC - Utah Office 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Mountain Case Ready 517 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC. - UTAH OPERATIONS 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Mountain #1165 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR TCM/EAG 141 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern States Flemingsburg Coop 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Building Products DALC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caron USA - Texas 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 19th Ave 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE NC005 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bashas 015 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City 025 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bashas 102 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.