Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Minnesota

Primary Automation Systems, Inc

Ham Lake, MN · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primary Automation Systems, Inc runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Primary Automation Systems, Inc: 10.1 TCR = 306% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primary Automation Systems, Inc safety composite

Primary Automation Systems, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Primary Automation Systems, Inc: 3.7 → 5.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 22.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

Primary Automation Systems, Inc's TCR rose 1.5 from 3.7 in 2019 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 22.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Ham Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 306% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #81/89
  • PHOTO Ironwood Industries
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ironwood Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Primary Automation Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primary Automation Systems, Inc averages 10.1 TCR (306% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primary Automation Systems, Inc TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=22.8 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Primary Automation Systems, Inc falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 89 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Minnesota.

Primary Automation Systems, Inc (40 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Primary Automation Systems, Inc
Primary Automation Systems, Inc (40 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Primary Automation Systems, Inc has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2023 22.8 22.8 1 0 0
2022 10.5 5.3 4 0 0
2021 8.2 5.5 3 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MN · Ham Lake

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Ham Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ironwood Industries 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viking Plastics Kentucky 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FDS Manufacturing Co 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABM by Prodex, LLC 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDML TW Shop - SE 0010 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Eye Feedmill 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms HL 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeders 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR CECO Concrete : Minneapolis 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality Cleaning Inc. DBA QC Companies 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cool Air Mechanical Inc 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR McKinley Elementary 80 FTE
NAT-TCR West Paw, Inc. 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Winston-Salem 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Reedsport 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Generations of Red Bay, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cascade Hollow Distilling Company 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hussmann Services Corporation - Wixom 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victus Sports, LLC 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.